bullzip problem with saplpd spooler

General usage of the PDF Printer.

Moderator: jr

Post Reply
buzzle
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:27 pm

bullzip problem with saplpd spooler

Post by buzzle »

I have I problem with sap. If i send print one by one to the bullzip no problem it works fine. The only thing is that windows ask me to confirm the printer every time (i don't know and i haven't found the way to bypass this).
When i try to send to bullzip multiple file using the saplpd spooler the ghostscript retun me this error
***************************************************************************************************************************************
An error occurred.

Error 1007: An error occured while running Ghostscript

Error: /undefined in P
Operand stack:
(0N\033&l0L\033&l26A\033&l0O\033&l48C\033&l0E\033&l0C\0339\n\n\033&a331V\033&a141H\033*p0P\033*r1U\033*r0F\033*t100R\033*r591s111T\033*r1A\033*b2M\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b2W\265\000\033*b18W\323\000\002\370\000\020\377\000\006\002\200P\001\340\000\b\357\000\033*b18W\323\000\002\204\000\020\377\000\006\002\200@...)
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1910 1 3 %oparray_pop 1909 1 3 %oparray_pop 1893 1 3 %oparray_pop 1787 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1173/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:77/200(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
Current file position is 339


Source: GUI

Internal hint: Run converter to create PDF file
***************************************************************************************************************************************************
I have installed Bullzip PDF Printer 7.2.0.1320 and i make the test with ghostscript 9.02 and 8.71 but the error is always the same.
Any suggestion ?
Pietro
Post Reply